Recent Changes for "Redding Wiki Regulations" - Redding Wiki

Redding Wiki Regulations

GeoffJohnson — 2008-08-24 19:11:03

(quick edit)

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- In order to create a more professional environment worthy of Redding's excellence there needs to be a few regulations. If you have any suggestions, comments, questions, complaints, compliments, etc on this subject please put them down under comments.	+ In order to create a more professional environment worthy of ["Redding"]'s excellence there needs to be a few regulations. If you have any suggestions, comments, questions, complaints, compliments, etc on this subject please put them down under comments.

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-10-20 19:22:27

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- All public pages will be styled in the ["Neutral Point of View"] (["NPOV"]) fashion. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure. Everyone who makes comments on a public figure page must use their real name and are free to express their opinions must source any facts.	+ All public pages will be styled in the ["Neutral Point of View"] (["NPOV"]) fashion. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure. Everyone who makes comments on a public figure page must use their real name and are free to express their opinions but must source any facts.

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-10-20 19:22:00

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- All public pages will be styled in the ["Neutral Point of View"] (["NPOV"]) fashion. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure.	+ All public pages will be styled in the ["Neutral Point of View"] (["NPOV"]) fashion. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure. Everyone who makes comments on a public figure page must use their real name and are free to express their opinions must source any facts.
Line 41:	Line 41:
- ''2007-09-15 23:10:03'' [[nbsp]] Perhaps there needs to be a page listing all those who have been banned similar to [wiki:davis:"BannedGroup/Talk"]? This would reduce confusion about who has been banned and why. --["Users/JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:12:06'' [[nbsp]] Several individuals have been banned due to Davis Wiki drama, and thus the reasons or stories of why they were banned would not be relevant to Redding. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:15:05'' [[nbsp]] But their account names should be listed with at least that comment. Banning is very serious and the integrity of any wiki requires a certain level of openness about it. --["Users/JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:16:55'' [[nbsp]] For at least a short period of time that makes sence. After that, it would probably be preferable to delete the pages, so that they don't show up in search engine results - for the banned person's own privacy sake, for one reason. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:18:47'' [[nbsp]] 1. The reasons for the ban are past histories on the Davis Wiki, thus it would not be appropriate to list all of their Davis Wiki sins on a Redding Wiki. David Poole managed to edit the Redding Wiki '''only''' because I forgot to screen him out. Within a short time all preemptive bans will be settled. As for banning a non-Davis Wiki editor or Redding editor, the reasons for such a ban will be highly detailed. 2. The system is so new right now that I wish to give a good impression when I pitch this to the Redding community and I would not like to have such a "negative" page be the first thing they notice. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:32:44'' [[nbsp]] Administratively a Banned Users page is very useful for Admins to explain to each other why someone was banned. --["Users/JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2007-09-16 01:14:59'' [[nbsp]] Steve, where can I find your list of banned users? It's important that you be open about this. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"] - ------ - I'd like to see there be a rule against revert wars. One revert on each side should be plenty, before a peaceful solution should be required to be hashed out on a talk page. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 22:58:01'' [[nbsp]] I would naturally agree except for the possibility of gang ups on a page. As such, if there is an edit war an administrator should lock it up after perhaps 10-20-30 edits, I think it's a judgement call. I don't see a revert war occuring under my design. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

DavidPoole — 2007-09-20 02:59:48

(quick edit)

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
- ["Banned user" Banned user's] pages will be shortly deleted after they are banned to protect the one being banned from unwanted edits to their pages.	+ ["Banned users" Banned user's] pages will be shortly deleted after they are banned to protect the one being banned from unwanted edits to their pages.

Redding Wiki Regulations

DavidPoole — 2007-09-20 02:59:17

(quick edit)

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
- Banned user pages will be shortly deleted after they are banned to protect the one being banned from unwanted edits to their pages.	+ ["Banned user" Banned user's] pages will be shortly deleted after they are banned to protect the one being banned from unwanted edits to their pages.

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 21:58:01

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 56:	Line 56:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 22:58:01'' [[nbsp]] I would naturally agree except for the possibility of gang ups on a page. As such, if there is an edit war an administrator should lock it up after perhaps 10-20-30 edits, I think it's a judgement call. I don't see a revert war occuring under my design. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 21:54:04

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 55:	Line 55:
- I'd like to see there be a rule against revert wars. One revert on each side should be plenty, before a peaceful solution should be required to be hashed out on a talk page.	+ I'd like to see there be a rule against revert wars. One revert on each side should be plenty, before a peaceful solution should be required to be hashed out on a talk page. --["Users/JoseBleckman"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 21:53:55

I'd like a rule against revert war.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 41:	Line 41:
- ''2007-09-15 22:28:25'' [[nbsp]] How can one identify which public page definition to follow? sorry, just a logic error on your part. --["Users/DavidPoole"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 22:31:26'' [[nbsp]] Seems logical to me. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 22:33:23'' [[nbsp]] I think he is referring to the duplicative headers both entitled "Public Pages". Maybe two of those need to be grouped as person pages and the other "all other pages" --["Users/JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 22:38:08'' [[nbsp]] True. Agreed. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] - ------
Line 62:	Line 54:
	+ ------ + I'd like to see there be a rule against revert wars. One revert on each side should be plenty, before a peaceful solution should be required to be hashed out on a talk page.

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 20:55:33

on swaring

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ ==Language== + + To keep things family friendly, no profanity.

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 20:11:06

Image regs.gif deleted.

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 20:10:50

Revert to version 23.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- ''' - == There are no regulations ==	+ [[Tableofcontents]]
Line 4:	Line 3:
- == No one is holding back free expression ==	+ In order to create a more professional environment worthy of Redding's excellence there needs to be a few regulations. If you have any suggestions, comments, questions, complaints, compliments, etc on this subject please put them down under comments.
Line 6:	Line 5:
- --> [[Image(regs.gif, noborder)]] <--
Line 8:	Line 6:
- == There is only Anarchy ==	+ ==Public Pages==
Line 10:	Line 8:
- '''	+ All public pages will be styled in the ["Neutral Point of View"] (["NPOV"]) fashion. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure. + + ==User Pages== + + Only users of their own user page may edit their user page. Other users may post comments if they so choose. Users have complete sovereignty over their user pages. + + + ==Sock Puppet Accounts== + + They are banned. Also accounts with names other than your own will also be banned. Identity theft is not tolerated. Real names are required to make sure that those making comments and edits are willing to stand by their statements, so as to promote truth and validity, and to help prevent sock puppets. + + ==Anonymous Users== + + Users with accounts other than your real name will be banned. This will prevent personal attacks on businesses and public figures from shady individuals. + + ==Administrator Reverts== + + If an administrator reverts a page and you are not in agreement with that revert or change talk it over on a talk page. If you continually revert a page against an administrator you may be given a few warnings before banned. + + ==Banned Users== + + Banned user pages will be shortly deleted after they are banned to protect the one being banned from unwanted edits to their pages. + + + ==Comments== + + Comments about a page (as opposed to about the subject of a page) should be eliminated once a consensus has been reached, to minimize clutter on a page. + + [[Comments]] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 22:28:25'' [[nbsp]] How can one identify which public page definition to follow? sorry, just a logic error on your part. --["Users/DavidPoole"] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 22:31:26'' [[nbsp]] Seems logical to me. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 22:33:23'' [[nbsp]] I think he is referring to the duplicative headers both entitled "Public Pages". Maybe two of those need to be grouped as person pages and the other "all other pages" --["Users/JasonAller"] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 22:38:08'' [[nbsp]] True. Agreed. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:10:03'' [[nbsp]] Perhaps there needs to be a page listing all those who have been banned similar to [wiki:davis:"BannedGroup/Talk"]? This would reduce confusion about who has been banned and why. --["Users/JasonAller"] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:12:06'' [[nbsp]] Several individuals have been banned due to Davis Wiki drama, and thus the reasons or stories of why they were banned would not be relevant to Redding. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:15:05'' [[nbsp]] But their account names should be listed with at least that comment. Banning is very serious and the integrity of any wiki requires a certain level of openness about it. --["Users/JasonAller"] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:16:55'' [[nbsp]] For at least a short period of time that makes sence. After that, it would probably be preferable to delete the pages, so that they don't show up in search engine results - for the banned person's own privacy sake, for one reason. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:18:47'' [[nbsp]] 1. The reasons for the ban are past histories on the Davis Wiki, thus it would not be appropriate to list all of their Davis Wiki sins on a Redding Wiki. David Poole managed to edit the Redding Wiki '''only''' because I forgot to screen him out. Within a short time all preemptive bans will be settled. As for banning a non-Davis Wiki editor or Redding editor, the reasons for such a ban will be highly detailed. 2. The system is so new right now that I wish to give a good impression when I pitch this to the Redding community and I would not like to have such a "negative" page be the first thing they notice. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"] + ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:32:44'' [[nbsp]] Administratively a Banned Users page is very useful for Admins to explain to each other why someone was banned. --["Users/JasonAller"] + ------ + ''2007-09-16 01:14:59'' [[nbsp]] Steve, where can I find your list of banned users? It's important that you be open about this. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

CarlaLewis — 2007-09-15 20:04:21

improved page

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[Tableofcontents]]	+ ''' + == There are no regulations ==
Line 3:	Line 4:
- In order to create a more professional environment worthy of Redding's excellence there needs to be a few regulations. If you have any suggestions, comments, questions, complaints, compliments, etc on this subject please put them down under comments.	+ == No one is holding back free expression ==
Line 5:	Line 6:
	+ --> [[Image(regs.gif, noborder)]] <--
Line 6:	Line 8:
- ==Public Pages==	+ == There is only Anarchy ==
Line 8:	Line 10:
- All public pages will be styled in the ["Neutral Point of View"] (["NPOV"]) fashion. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure. - - ==User Pages== - - Only users of their own user page may edit their user page. Other users may post comments if they so choose. Users have complete sovereignty over their user pages. - - - ==Sock Puppet Accounts== - - They are banned. Also accounts with names other than your own will also be banned. Identity theft is not tolerated. Real names are required to make sure that those making comments and edits are willing to stand by their statements, so as to promote truth and validity, and to help prevent sock puppets. - - ==Anonymous Users== - - Users with accounts other than your real name will be banned. This will prevent personal attacks on businesses and public figures from shady individuals. - - ==Administrator Reverts== - - If an administrator reverts a page and you are not in agreement with that revert or change talk it over on a talk page. If you continually revert a page against an administrator you may be given a few warnings before banned. - - ==Banned Users== - - Banned user pages will be shortly deleted after they are banned to protect the one being banned from unwanted edits to their pages. - - - ==Comments== - - Comments about a page (as opposed to about the subject of a page) should be eliminated once a consensus has been reached, to minimize clutter on a page. - - [[Comments]] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 22:28:25'' [[nbsp]] How can one identify which public page definition to follow? sorry, just a logic error on your part. --["Users/DavidPoole"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 22:31:26'' [[nbsp]] Seems logical to me. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 22:33:23'' [[nbsp]] I think he is referring to the duplicative headers both entitled "Public Pages". Maybe two of those need to be grouped as person pages and the other "all other pages" --["Users/JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 22:38:08'' [[nbsp]] True. Agreed. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:10:03'' [[nbsp]] Perhaps there needs to be a page listing all those who have been banned similar to [wiki:davis:"BannedGroup/Talk"]? This would reduce confusion about who has been banned and why. --["Users/JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:12:06'' [[nbsp]] Several individuals have been banned due to Davis Wiki drama, and thus the reasons or stories of why they were banned would not be relevant to Redding. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:15:05'' [[nbsp]] But their account names should be listed with at least that comment. Banning is very serious and the integrity of any wiki requires a certain level of openness about it. --["Users/JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:16:55'' [[nbsp]] For at least a short period of time that makes sence. After that, it would probably be preferable to delete the pages, so that they don't show up in search engine results - for the banned person's own privacy sake, for one reason. --["Users/JoseBleckman"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:18:47'' [[nbsp]] 1. The reasons for the ban are past histories on the Davis Wiki, thus it would not be appropriate to list all of their Davis Wiki sins on a Redding Wiki. David Poole managed to edit the Redding Wiki '''only''' because I forgot to screen him out. Within a short time all preemptive bans will be settled. As for banning a non-Davis Wiki editor or Redding editor, the reasons for such a ban will be highly detailed. 2. The system is so new right now that I wish to give a good impression when I pitch this to the Redding community and I would not like to have such a "negative" page be the first thing they notice. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"] - ------ - ''2007-09-15 23:32:44'' [[nbsp]] Administratively a Banned Users page is very useful for Admins to explain to each other why someone was banned. --["Users/JasonAller"] - ------ - ''2007-09-16 01:14:59'' [[nbsp]] Steve, where can I find your list of banned users? It's important that you be open about this. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]	+ '''

Redding Wiki Regulations

CarlaLewis — 2007-09-15 20:03:17

Upload of image regs.gif.

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 19:26:16

removing deleted link

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 56:	Line 56:
- ''2007-09-15 23:32:44'' [[nbsp]] Administratively a ["Banned Users"] page is very useful for Admins to explain to each other why someone was banned. --["Users/JasonAller"]	+ ''2007-09-15 23:32:44'' [[nbsp]] Administratively a Banned Users page is very useful for Admins to explain to each other why someone was banned. --["Users/JasonAller"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 17:38:34

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- They are banned. Also accounts with names other than your own will also be banned. Identity theft is not tolerated.	+ They are banned. Also accounts with names other than your own will also be banned. Identity theft is not tolerated. Real names are required to make sure that those making comments and edits are willing to stand by their statements, so as to promote truth and validity, and to help prevent sock puppets.

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 17:33:55

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- They are banned. Also accounts with names other than your own will also be banned.	+ They are banned. Also accounts with names other than your own will also be banned. Identity theft is not tolerated.

Redding Wiki Regulations

Graham.Freeman — 2007-09-15 17:14:59

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 57:	Line 57:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-16 01:14:59'' [[nbsp]] Steve, where can I find your list of banned users? It's important that you be open about this. --["Users/Graham.Freeman"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 15:57:44

Revert to version 17.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 26:	Line 26:
- - == Doing things that Steven doesn't like == - If Steve doesn't like you or you do something he doesn't like, prepare to be banned.

Redding Wiki Regulations

2007-09-15 15:43:26

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 26:	Line 26:
	+ + == Doing things that Steven doesn't like == + If Steve doesn't like you or you do something he doesn't like, prepare to be banned.

Redding Wiki Regulations

JasonAller — 2007-09-15 15:32:44

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 55:	Line 55:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:32:44'' [[nbsp]] Administratively a ["Banned Users"] page is very useful for Admins to explain to each other why someone was banned. --["Users/JasonAller"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 15:20:36

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 54:	Line 54:
- ''2007-09-15 23:18:47'' [[nbsp]] 1. The reasons for the ban are past histories on the Davis Wiki, thus it would not be appropriate to list all of their Davis Wiki sins on a Redding Wiki. David Poole managed to edit the Davis Wiki '''only''' because I forgot to screen him out. Within a short time all preemptive bans will be settled. As for banning a non-Davis Wiki editor or Redding editor, the reasons for such a ban will be highly detailed. 2. The system is so new right now that I wish to give a good impression when I pitch this to the Redding community and I would not like to have such a "negative" page be the first thing they notice. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]	+ ''2007-09-15 23:18:47'' [[nbsp]] 1. The reasons for the ban are past histories on the Davis Wiki, thus it would not be appropriate to list all of their Davis Wiki sins on a Redding Wiki. David Poole managed to edit the Redding Wiki '''only''' because I forgot to screen him out. Within a short time all preemptive bans will be settled. As for banning a non-Davis Wiki editor or Redding editor, the reasons for such a ban will be highly detailed. 2. The system is so new right now that I wish to give a good impression when I pitch this to the Redding community and I would not like to have such a "negative" page be the first thing they notice. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 15:18:47

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 53:	Line 53:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:18:47'' [[nbsp]] 1. The reasons for the ban are past histories on the Davis Wiki, thus it would not be appropriate to list all of their Davis Wiki sins on a Redding Wiki. David Poole managed to edit the Davis Wiki '''only''' because I forgot to screen him out. Within a short time all preemptive bans will be settled. As for banning a non-Davis Wiki editor or Redding editor, the reasons for such a ban will be highly detailed. 2. The system is so new right now that I wish to give a good impression when I pitch this to the Redding community and I would not like to have such a "negative" page be the first thing they notice. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 15:16:55

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 51:	Line 51:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:16:55'' [[nbsp]] For at least a short period of time that makes sence. After that, it would probably be preferable to delete the pages, so that they don't show up in search engine results - for the banned person's own privacy sake, for one reason. --["Users/JoseBleckman"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

JasonAller — 2007-09-15 15:15:05

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 49:	Line 49:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:15:05'' [[nbsp]] But their account names should be listed with at least that comment. Banning is very serious and the integrity of any wiki requires a certain level of openness about it. --["Users/JasonAller"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 15:12:38

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 48:	Line 48:
- ''2007-09-15 23:12:06'' [[nbsp]] Several individuals have been banned to Davis Wiki drama, and thus the reasons or stories of why they were banned would not be relevant to Redding. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]	+ ''2007-09-15 23:12:06'' [[nbsp]] Several individuals have been banned due to Davis Wiki drama, and thus the reasons or stories of why they were banned would not be relevant to Redding. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 15:12:06

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 47:	Line 47:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:12:06'' [[nbsp]] Several individuals have been banned to Davis Wiki drama, and thus the reasons or stories of why they were banned would not be relevant to Redding. --["Users/SteveOstrowski"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

JasonAller — 2007-09-15 15:10:03

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 45:	Line 45:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 23:10:03'' [[nbsp]] Perhaps there needs to be a page listing all those who have been banned similar to [wiki:davis:"BannedGroup/Talk"]? This would reduce confusion about who has been banned and why. --["Users/JasonAller"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 15:07:24

I am kind

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 27:	Line 27:
	+ ==Banned Users== + + Banned user pages will be shortly deleted after they are banned to protect the one being banned from unwanted edits to their pages. + +

Redding Wiki Regulations

JasonAller — 2007-09-15 14:45:43

(quick edit)

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- All public pages will be styled NPOV, which stands for Neutral Point of View. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure.	+ All public pages will be styled in the ["Neutral Point of View"] (["NPOV"]) fashion. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure.

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 14:44:01

Idea for comment regs.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 27:	Line 27:
	+ ==Comments== + + Comments about a page (as opposed to about the subject of a page) should be eliminated once a consensus has been reached, to minimize clutter on a page. +

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 14:40:08

agreed

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
- All public pages will be styled NPOV, which stands for Neutral Point of View. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time.	+ All public pages will be styled NPOV, which stands for Neutral Point of View. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- Only users of their own user page may edit their user page. Other users may post comments if they so choose. Users have complete soveriegnty over their user pages.	+ Only users of their own user page may edit their user page. Other users may post comments if they so choose. Users have complete sovereignty over their user pages.
Line 14:	Line 14:
- ==Public Pages== - - All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure.

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 14:38:08

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 37:	Line 37:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 22:38:08'' [[nbsp]] True. Agreed. --["Users/JoseBleckman"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

JasonAller — 2007-09-15 14:33:23

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 35:	Line 35:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 22:33:23'' [[nbsp]] I think he is referring to the duplicative headers both entitled "Public Pages". Maybe two of those need to be grouped as person pages and the other "all other pages" --["Users/JasonAller"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

JoseBleckman — 2007-09-15 14:31:26

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 33:	Line 33:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 22:31:26'' [[nbsp]] Seems logical to me. --["Users/JoseBleckman"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

DavidPoole — 2007-09-15 14:28:25

Comment added.

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-15 22:28:25'' [[nbsp]] How can one identify which public page definition to follow? sorry, just a logic error on your part. --["Users/DavidPoole"]

Redding Wiki Regulations

SteveOstrowski — 2007-09-15 14:20:16

Differences for Redding Wiki Regulations

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ [[Tableofcontents]] + + In order to create a more professional environment worthy of Redding's excellence there needs to be a few regulations. If you have any suggestions, comments, questions, complaints, compliments, etc on this subject please put them down under comments. + + + ==Public Pages== + + All public pages will be styled NPOV, which stands for Neutral Point of View. This Wiki is not to harass, defame, criticize, or be used for personal attacks nor shall it be used to overly compliment a public figure. A public figure is generally defined as a politician but can also be individuals that have a high amount of influence, activity, or responsibility in Redding. A public figure may have a user page and a public page at the same time. + + ==User Pages== + + Only users of their own user page may edit their user page. Other users may post comments if they so choose. Users have complete soveriegnty over their user pages. + + ==Public Pages== + + All editors may edit public pages including the user in which the public page is being edited about. All public pages should follow a NPOV philosophy. All public pages of people or users in Redding will be contacted as to the existence of their public page and the administrators will work to resolve any problems between the community and the public figure. + + ==Sock Puppet Accounts== + + They are banned. Also accounts with names other than your own will also be banned. + + ==Anonymous Users== + + Users with accounts other than your real name will be banned. This will prevent personal attacks on businesses and public figures from shady individuals. + + ==Administrator Reverts== + + If an administrator reverts a page and you are not in agreement with that revert or change talk it over on a talk page. If you continually revert a page against an administrator you may be given a few warnings before banned. + + [[Comments]]